if a book has one passage, one idea with the power to change a person's life, that alone justifies reading it, rereading it, and finding room for it on one's own shelves.
<Harold S. Kushner in 'Forward' Chapter>
I. EXPERIENCES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP
Sensitive people who were used to a rich intellectual life may have suffered much pain (the were often of a delicate constitution), but the damage to their inner selves was less. They were able to retreat from their terrible surroundings to a life of inner riches and spiritual freedom.
As inner life of the prisoner tended to become more intense, he also experienced the beuaty of art and nature as never before. (skip) If someone had seen our faces on the journey from Auschwitz to a Bavarian camp as we beheld the mountains of Salzburg with their summits glowing in the sunset, through the little barred windows of the prison carriage, he would never have believed that those were the faces of men who had given up all hope of life and liberty. Despite that factor-or maybe because of it - we were carried away by nature's beauty, which we had missed for so long.
The violin wept and a part of me wept with it.
Dostoevski said once, "There is only one thing that I dread: not to be worthy of sufferings."
What does Spinoza say in his Ethics? - "Affectus, qui passio est, desinit esse passio simulatque eius claram et distinctam formamus ideam." Emotion, which is suffering, ceases to be suffering as we form clear and precise picture of it.
Nietzsche's words, "He who has a why to live for can bear with almost any how,"
And I quoted Nietzsche: "Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich starker." (That which does not kill me, makes me stronger.)
Life in a concentration camp tore open the human soul and exposed its depths. Is it surprising that in those depths we again found only human qualities which in their very nature were a mixture of good and evil? The rift dividing good from evil, which goes through all human beings, reaches into the lowest depths and becomes apparent even on the bottom of the abyss which is laid open by the concentration camp.
Here it was not one's fellow man (whose superficiality and lack of feeling was so disgusting that one finally felt like creeping into a hole and neither hearing nor seeing human beings any more) but fate itself which seemed so cruel. A man who for years had thought he had reached the absolute limit of all possible suffering now found that suffering has no limits, and that he could suffer still more, and still more intensely.
II. LOGOTHERAPY IN A NUTSHELL
Logotherapy focuses rather on the future, that is to say, on the meanings to be fulfilled by patient in his future.
Logos is a Greek word which denotes "meaning." (skip) focuses on the meaning of human existence as well as on man's search for such a meaning. According to logotherapy, this striving to find a meaning in one's life is the primary motivational force in man.
This meaning is unique and specific in that is must and can be fulfilled by him alone; (skip) Man, however, is able to live and even to die for the sake of his ideals and values!
Through an analysis lasting five years, the patient had been prompted more and more to accept his analyst's interpretations until he finally was unable to see the forest of reality for the trees of symbols and images. (skip) I would strictly deny that one's search for a meaning to his existence, or even his doubt of it, in every case is derived from, or results in , any disease. (skip) A man's concern, even his despair, over the worthwhileness of life is an existential distress but by no means a mental disease.
What man actually needs is not a tensionless state but rather the striving and struggling for worthwhile goal, a freely chosen task.
that feeling of which so many patients complain today, namely, the feeling of the total and ultimate meaninglessness of their lives. They lack awareness of a meaning worth living for. They are haunted by the experience of their inner emptiness, a void withing themselves; they are caught in that situation which I have called the "existential vacuum."
No instinct tells him what he has to do, and no tradition tells him what he ought to do; sometimes he does not even know what he wishes to do.
Sometimes the frustrated will to meaning is vicariously compensated for by a will to power, including the most primitive form of the will to power, the will to money. In other cases, the place of frustrated will to meaning is taken by the will to pleasure.
One should not search for an abstract meaning of life. Everyone has his own specific vocation or mission in life to carry out a concrete assignment which demands fulfillment. Therein he cannot replaced, nor can his life be repeated. (skip)
Ultimately, man should not ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather he must recognize that it is he who is asked. In a word, each man is questioned by life; and he can only answer to life by answering for his own life;
One should not search for an abstract meaning of life. Everyone has his own specific vocation or mission in life to carry out a concrete assignment which demands fulfillment. Therein he cannot be replaced, nor can his life be repeated. (skip)
but rather he must recognize that it is he who is asked. In a word, each man is questioned by life; and he can only answer to life by answering for his own life;
"Live as if you were living already for the second time and as if you had acted the first time as wrongly as you are about to act now!"
"the self-transcendence of human existence." It denotes the fact that being human always points, and is directed, to something, or someone, other than oneself - be it a meaning to fulfill or another human being to encounter.
When we are no longer able to change a situation, (skip) we are challenged to change ourselves.
To suffer unnecessarily is masochistic rather than heroic.
I have made a better human being out of my son."
But man is more than psyche.
things determine each other, but man is ultimately self-determining What he becomes - within the limits of endowment and environment - he has made out of himself. (skip) behave like swine while others behave like saints. Man has both potentialities within himself; which one is actualized depends on decisions but not on conditions.
POSTSCRIPT 1984
that optimism is not anything to be commanded or ordered.
But happiness cannot be pursued; it must ensue. One must have a reason to "be happy." Once the reason is found, however, one becomes happy automatically.
As for causation of the feeling of meaninglessness, (skip) that people have enough to live by but nothing to live for; they have the means but no meaning. To be sure, some do not even have means. (skip) being jobless was equated with being useless, and being useless was equated with having a meaningless life. (skip) The truth is that man does not live by welfare alone.
but he did decide not to let himself be broken by what had happened to him.
young people should envy them. It is true that the old have no opportunities, no possibilities in the future. But they have more than that. Instead of possibilities in the future, they have realities in the past - the potentialities they have actualized, the meanings they have fulfilled, the value they have realized - and nothing and nobody can ever remove these assets from the past.
(but everything great is just as difficult to realize as it is rare to find) (skip) decent people? It is true that they form a minority. More than that, they always will remain minority. And yet I see therein the very challenge to join the minority. For the world is in a bad state, but everything will become still worse unless each of us does his best.
- Nazi 의 집단수용소에서 살아남은 심리학자이자 의사인 Frankl 박사의 tragic optimism에 대한 의문은 인간의 자신의 삶에 대한 의미로 귀결된다고 이 책은 말하고 있다. 사람이 생각할 수 있는 극단의 상황에서, 동료의 대부분이 가스실의 연기로 사라지는 상황에서, 가족이 죽어가는 상황에서, 그래도 살아낼 수 있었던 힘의 근원은 무엇인가? 그는 인간이 자신의 생에서 의미를 찾을 수 있다면 아니면 혹은 의미를 찾거나 의심하는 과정에서 그 모든 역경의 과정에 의미가 부여된다고 말한다.
극단적인 고통의 상황뿐만 아니라, 인생이라는 여정에 포함된 모든 고난의 과정에서 자신에게만 독특한 의미를 찾아나가는 것이 인생을 제대로 살아가는 과정이라고. 그 절대적 긍정의 힘은 어디서 비롯되는가? 그것은 한 개인이 자신의 삶의 의미를 찾아나가는 데서 (혹은 심지어 의미를 의심하는 데에서부터도) 시작한다고 그는 역설한다. 이 존재의 의미를 찾지 못하면 존재의 진공상태에 빠지거나 잘못된 방향으로 (힘에의 의지, 돈에의 의지, 즐거움에의 안착 등) 에너지를 쏟게 된다고 한다. 인간은 조건의 산물이 아니라 스스로 결정의 산물이며, 자신은 자기자신으로부터 만들어진다고 한다.
그의 tragic optimism에 절대적으로 긍정할 수 있는가? 아마도 그렇다고 말하기에는 나의 경험의 폭이 너무도 작다. 그러나 그의 주체적 인간으로서의 삶을 의미를 찾는 과정으로의 관점을 그의 경험으로서 증명해보인 것에 대해서는 가슴깊은 동의 밖에 할 수 없는 것 같다. 또한 'logotherapy'라는 영역으로 인간에게 필요한 것은 결국 자신의 삶의 의미라는 것을 깨닫는 과정, Jaspers 가 말한대로 '인간은 자기 자신이 되는 것이다'라는 말과도 상통한다. 집단 수용소에서 Frankl박사가 수없이 자신에게 되내인 것처럼, 니체가 말한대로 'why'를 발견하면 'how'는 어떻게든 되는 것인지도.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기